Posts Tagged ‘wall street journal article’

Shortage of Primary Care Physicians in Massachusetts

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Today’s Wall St Journal has an editorial entitled, “The Failure of RomneyCare”.  It contains some fascinating statistics about , the average physician availability in the Bay State.  In fact, the Massachusetts Medical Society refers to the situation as a “critical shortage” of primary care physicians.  “56% of Massachusetts internal medicine physicians no longer are accepting new patients according to a 2009 physician work-force study conducted by the Massachusetts Medical Society.  For new patients who do get an appointment with a primary-care doctor, the waiting time is 44 days… ”

Dr. Sandra Schneider, the vice president of the American College of Emergency Physicians, told the Boston Globe last April,  “Just because you have insurance doesn’t mean there’s a physician who can see you.”

Once again the issues are pretty clear.  Our ongoing medical issues are centered on access and cost containment.

“Just Say No To Health-Care Summitt” WSJ 2/17/10

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

Great editorial from Betsy McCaughey in today’s opinion section.  She is the Chairman of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths.  Lots of good points but the best one is this:  40%.  In fiscal 2009 total government spending (fed, state and local) exceeded 40% of GDP.  It is the first time that has happened since WWII.  You can’t get economic growth if government is confiscating that much of the economy’s production.  “Americans don’t want to solve every social problem at the expense of their freedom to choose how to spend their own money.”

Health care on CNBC this morning

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

Today David M. Walker from the Peter G. Peterson Foundation was on Squawk Box on CNBC this morning.  The foundation is a leading entity in the fight to maintain fiscal sustainability of the United States.  Walker rightly pointed out that our success, if not our very survival, will be based on our ability to continue to grow our economy.  A large piece of the puzzle is health care.  The U.S. spends 17% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on health care while the rest of the industrialized world spends about 9% of GDP.  That is a huge disadvantage in our global competitiveness and in our ability to attract capital to this country.  Our challenge is to contain costs without restricting access or rationing care.

Past Wall St Journal editorial

Saturday, February 13th, 2010

About a month or so back I read an editorial in the Wall St Journal that really shed some light on the health care debate. It was written by a freelance writer in New York and it discussed the impact the bill would have on his personal health decisions. He pointed out that the bill had a mandate to purchase full coverage. For him as a single person in New York the purchase price of a full policy with all of the required coverage would run about $13k per year. Currently, he carried only a catastrophic coverage policy that cost about $2k per year. He figured that left him with $11k per year to cover all of his incidental medical expenses and if he stayed under that limit, he was ahead of the game. He rightly pointed out that this was his health plan, he liked it and that President Obama had repeatedly assured him that if he liked it, he would get to keep it. Unfortunately, that is not the case. The bill would force him to join the insurance pool precisely to utilize his $11k to subsidize others who had no insurance. While I was reading this editorial, it occured to me the efficacy of his plan. The AMA created something called Common Procedural Terminology or CPT codes. It has created a procedural based system. Every procedure has a CPT code and reinbursement is based on the code. The codes effectively dictate what is repaid to the physician. The practice of medicine becomes one long list of procedures. The more procedures, the more repayment. Doctor compensation is not results based, it is procedures based.